Exitus AgencyExitus Agency

Service · AI search

AI visibility audit

AI View is our name for this: AI seeing you, understanding you and being able to recommend you. We check whether AI assistants — ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot and the rest — can read your site, and what they understand when they do. You get a score with the evidence behind it, the failures ranked by impact, and the files ready to apply. The most common reason for not appearing is not the content: it is an access block nobody told you existed.

Full report · €49 + VAT

Every check, 30 real questions to ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, a comparison with two competitors, a fix plan and the files already written. It reaches you by email within 3 working days.

Buy the report →

Before you pay, see a full sample report ↓

Rather try first? The checker is free.

Three steps, from free to fixed

  1. Free checker, 30 seconds. It sees whether ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot and the rest can get into your site, and runs 18 checks on your home page. No sign-up. Go to the checker.
  2. Full report, €49 + VAT. Every check on this page, 30 real questions to ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, a comparison with two competitors a plan that says what we do and what we need from you, and the files already written (robots.txt, llms.txt…) for you, your developer or us to install.
  3. We fix it, at a fixed price. Before we start we tell you what we can fix and what we can’t, and which access we need. After that, we check it every month.

The first thing we check, because it fails most often

We request your site while identifying as each engine in turn, using their real identifiers: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Googlebot. Then we look at what code each one receives.

Many hosting providers block AI crawlers by default, without telling anyone. The engine gets an error, never reads a single word, and your site simply does not exist for it. This is not a penalty and not a content problem: it is a closed door. And you cannot see it from your browser, because for you the site opens perfectly.

In the full report, everything in depth

The checker already runs some of these on your home page; the report goes through them across the whole site and adds the rest.

  • The raw HTML, with no JavaScript executed: that is how you are read. If the text only appears once something is clicked, they never see it.
  • The languages: each with its own address and its hreflang links, or only one gets indexed.
  • Structured data: what you tell the machine you are, in its own language.
  • The canonical address: pointing at the domain that actually serves the site, not the one that redirects.
  • Pages that do not exist: if every one answers "fine", the engine cannot tell where your site ends.
  • Weight and speed of what must be downloaded before a single sentence can be read.
  • Citable content: direct answers and frequently asked questions, which is the shape these engines quote.
  • Your reputation off your own site: what is said about your brand where you are not the one writing, and which namesakes you get confused with.

What you get, and what happens next

A scored report with evidence — the exact command we ran and the exact response we received, so nothing rests on taking our word for it. A plan ordered by impact, not by difficulty. And the files already written: robots.txt, llms.txt, sitemap, structured data.

If we run the site, we apply them. If someone else does, they can apply them as delivered, with nothing to translate.

And it does not end at delivery: these settings change on their own — a provider updates a policy, an engine changes its identifier. That is why the review is periodic: each month we run it with a tool of our own and read it ourselves, telling you immediately if something fails, and each quarter you get in writing whether anything changed — we don’t write just to write.

Frequently asked questions

Why doesn’t my site appear in ChatGPT?

The most common cause is not the content: it is access. Many hosting providers block AI crawlers by default, so they receive an error and never get to read anything. Other frequent causes: content that only exists once JavaScript runs, or missing structured data.

Is this the same as SEO?

They overlap, but they are not the same. Classic SEO competes for a position in a list of links. Here you compete to be the source the machine cites inside an answer, and there access, structured data and brand mentions off your own site weigh more than inbound links.

How long before it shows?

Access is fixed the same day and verified immediately. Whether an engine cites you depends on when it crawls you again and how much reputation you have off your own site, and that takes weeks or months. Be wary of anyone promising a date.

Doesn’t blocking AI crawlers protect my content?

It is a legitimate decision, but worth taking knowingly. Blocking means giving up on being recommended. It can be separated: let in the ones answering users, block the ones only collecting material for training. That distinction is written into robots.txt, and it is part of what we deliver.

Shall we check whether they can read you?

If you’d rather we look at it with you, or your site is complex (a shop, a client area, hundreds of pages), write to us and we’ll take a look.

Write to us →